Login / Signup

Comparative Effectiveness of Natalizumab Versus Anti-CD20 in Highly Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis After Fingolimod Withdrawal.

Fabien RollotJustine CouturierRomain CaseySandrine WiertlewskiMarc DebouverieJean PelletierJérôme De SèzePierre LabaugeAurélie RuetEric ThouvenotJonathan CironEric BergerOlivier GoutPierre ClavelouBruno StankoffOlivier CasezBertrand BourreHélène ZephirThibault MoreauChristine Lebrun-FrenayElisabeth MaillartGilles EdanJean-Philippe NeauAlexis MontcuquetPhilippe CabreJean-Philippe CamdessanchéGilles DeferHaifa Ben NasrAude MauroussetKarolina HankiewiczCorinne PottierEmmanuelle LeraySandra VukusicDavid-Axel Laplaud
Published in: Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics (2022)
In France, two therapeutic strategies can be offered after fingolimod (FNG) withdrawal to highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients: natalizumab (NTZ) or anti-CD20. We compared the effectiveness of these two strategies as a switch for FNG within the OFSEP database. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse. Other outcomes were the relapse rates over 3-month periods, time to worsening the EDSS score, proportion of patients with worsened 24-month MRI, time to treatment discontinuation, and incidence rates of serious adverse events. The dynamics of event rates over time were modeled using multidimensional penalized splines, allowing the possibility to model the effects of covariates in a flexible way, considering non-linearity and interactions. A total of 740 patients were included (337 under anti-CD20 and 403 under NTZ). There was no difference between the two treatments regarding the dynamic of the first occurrence of relapse, with a monthly probability of 5.0% at initiation and 1.0% after 6 months. The rate of EDSS worsening increased in both groups until 6 months and then decreased. No difference in the proportion of patients with new T2 lesions at 24 months was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a greater risk of NTZ discontinuation was found compared to anti-CD20. This study showed no difference between NTZ and anti-CD20 after the FNG switch regarding the clinical and radiological activity. The effect of these treatments was optimal after 6 months and there was more frequent discontinuation of NTZ after 18 months, probably mainly related to JC virus seroconversions.
Keyphrases