Login / Signup

Uncovering survivorship bias in longitudinal mental health surveys during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mark É CzeislerJoshua F WileyCharles A CzeislerShantha M W RajaratnamMark E Howard
Published in: Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences (2021)
Our findings reveal significant survivorship bias among longitudinal survey respondents, indicating that restricting analytic samples to only respondents who provide repeated assessments in longitudinal survey studies could lead to overly optimistic interpretations of mental health trends over time. Cross-sectional or planned missing data designs may provide more accurate estimates of population-level adverse mental health symptom prevalence than longitudinal surveys.
Keyphrases
  • cross sectional
  • mental health
  • mental illness
  • risk factors
  • emergency department
  • genome wide
  • big data
  • gene expression
  • machine learning
  • young adults
  • dna methylation
  • patient reported