Clinical utility of genomic signatures in young breast cancer patients: a systematic review.
Cynthia Villarreal-GarzaAna S Ferrigno GuajardoCynthia De la Garza-RamosRegina Barragan-CarrilloMatteo LambertiniHatem A AzimPublished in: NPJ breast cancer (2020)
Risk stratification by genomic signatures has been shown to improve prognostication and guide treatment decisions among patients with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. However, their role in young women has not been fully elucidated. In this review, a systematic search was conducted for published articles and abstracts from major congresses that evaluated the use of genomic signatures in young breast cancer patients. A total of 71 studies were analyzed, including 561,188 patients of whom 27,748 (4.9%) were young. Women aged ≤40 years were subjected to genomic testing at a similar rate to older women but had a higher proportion of intermediate- to high-risk tumors when classified by EndoPredict (p = 0.04), MammaPrint (p < 0.01), and Oncotype DX (p < 0.01). In young women with low genomic risk, 6-year distant recurrence-free survival was 94%, while 5-year overall survival was nearly 100%. Nonetheless, young patients classified as low-risk had a higher tendency to receive chemotherapy compared to their older counterparts. In conclusion, genomic tests are useful tools for identifying young patients in whom chemotherapy omission is appropriate.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- copy number
- free survival
- peritoneal dialysis
- middle aged
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- genome wide
- dna methylation
- patient reported outcomes
- radiation therapy
- systematic review
- physical activity
- squamous cell carcinoma
- young adults
- locally advanced
- rectal cancer
- replacement therapy
- case control