Login / Signup

Why do healthcare researchers in South Asia publish in predatory journals? A scoping review.

Komal KashyapAsmat Ara IslamJoris Gielen
Published in: Developing world bioethics (2023)
Predatory journals offer the promise of prompt publication to those willing to pay the article submission or processing fee. However, these journals do not offer rigorous peer review. Studies have shown that a substantial share of corresponding authors in predatory journals come from South Asia, particularly India. This scoping review aims to assess what is known about the reasons why healthcare researchers working in South Asia publish in predatory journals. 66 reports (14 editorials, 20 letters, 5 research reports, 10 opinion articles, 14 reviews, 2 commentaries and 1 news report) were included in the data charting and analysis. The analysis of the reports identified three main reasons that made South Asian healthcare researchers publish in predatory journals: pressure to publish, lack of research support, and pseudo benefits. The review shows that predatory publishing in South Asia is a complex phenomenon. Combating predatory publications requires a holistic strategy that supersedes merely blacklisting these journals or listing criteria for journals that do meet academic standards.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • meta analyses
  • systematic review
  • adverse drug
  • randomized controlled trial
  • electronic health record
  • deep learning
  • social media
  • case control