Are Physics Forceps Less Traumatic than Conventional Forceps for Tooth Extraction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the clinical outcomes with physics forceps compared to those with conventional forceps for closed dental extraction. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all the published randomized clinical trials that compared the relevant clinical outcomes with physics forceps to those with conventional forceps for closed dental extraction. A total of 11 studies were included. The adverse events were significantly lower with physics forceps ( n = 48) compared to with conventional forceps ( n = 120), with an odds ratio of 0.42 [0.25, 0.70], Z = 3.78 ( p = 0.0002), and I 2 = 21%. There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of GL ( p = 0.04), and tooth or root fracture ( p = 0.0009). Operating time was significantly lower in physics forceps than that of conventional forceps, mean difference (-20.13 (-30.11, -10.15)), Z = 3.78 ( p = 0.0001), I 2 = 79%. The available evidence is limited by a high risk of bias and low evidence certainty. Based on the current evidence, physics forceps might be better than the conventional extraction forceps in terms of the extraction duration, pain after extraction, trauma to both hard and soft tissue, and complications. Physics forceps are newer instruments that have not yet been introduced in the teaching of dental graduates. The introduction of physics forceps can be time saving, less invasive and reduce post-extraction complications.