Login / Signup

International treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects.

Steven J HoffmanPrativa BaralSusan Rogers Van KatwykLathika SritharanMatthew HughsamHarkanwal RandhawaGigi O LinSophie CampbellBrooke CampusMaria das Neves Dantas da Silveira BarrosNeda ForoughianGaëlle GrouxElliot GunnGordon GuyattRoojin HabibiMina KarabitAneesh KarirKrista KrujaJohn N LavisOlivia LeeBinxi LiRanjana NagiKiyuri NaickerJohn-Arne RøttingenNicola SaharArchita SrivastavaAli TejparMaxwell TranYu-Qing ZhangQi ZhouMathieu J P Poirier
Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2022)
There are over 250,000 international treaties that aim to foster global cooperation. But are treaties actually helpful for addressing global challenges? This systematic field-wide evidence synthesis of 224 primary studies and meta-analysis of the higher-quality 82 studies finds treaties have mostly failed to produce their intended effects. The only exceptions are treaties governing international trade and finance, which consistently produced intended effects. We also found evidence that impactful treaties achieve their effects through socialization and normative processes rather than longer-term legal processes and that enforcement mechanisms are the only modifiable treaty design choice with the potential to improve the effectiveness of treaties governing environmental, human rights, humanitarian, maritime, and security policy domains. This evidence synthesis raises doubts about the value of international treaties that neither regulate trade or finance nor contain enforcement mechanisms.
Keyphrases
  • healthcare
  • endothelial cells
  • systematic review
  • randomized controlled trial
  • public health
  • mental health