The ACS-TQIP palliative care guidelines at two level I trauma centres: a prospective study of patient and caregiver satisfaction.
Rebecca VogelConstance McGrawDiane RedmondPamela Bourg RetiredChester DreimanAllen TannerNeal LynchDavid Bar-OrPublished in: BMJ supportive & palliative care (2020)
There were 572 patients (299 pre; 273 post) and 595 caregivers (334 pre; 261 post) included. Overall patient satisfaction significantly increased post implementation (82.0 vs 86.0, p=0.001). After adjustment, the implementation of the guidelines was an independent predictor of higher overall patient satisfaction (least squares mean (LSM= (83.8% (95%CI 81.2%-86.5%) vs 80.3% (77.7%-82.9%), p=0.003)). Compared with preimplementation, patient satisfaction was significantly higher post implementation in the following domains: information giving (80.9 vs 85.5, p=0.001), followed by physical care (82.2 vs 86.0, p=0.002), availability of care (83.4 vs 86.8, p=0.007) and psychosocial care (84.7 vs 87.6, p=0.04). No significant differences in caregiver satisfaction were found before or after adjustment (LSMpre: 83.1% (95%CI 80.9%-85.3%) vs. post: 82.4% (80.3%-84.5%), p=0.56)) CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the implementation of PC guidelines significantly improved patient satisfaction following traumatic injury, while maintaining robust caregiver satisfaction.
Keyphrases
- patient satisfaction
- palliative care
- healthcare
- quality improvement
- primary care
- advanced cancer
- clinical practice
- mental health
- end stage renal disease
- spinal cord injury
- acute coronary syndrome
- pain management
- physical activity
- prognostic factors
- case report
- peritoneal dialysis
- social media
- patient reported
- health information