Diagnostic Performance of Serial High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Measurements in the Emergency Setting.
Peter A KavsakMark Keith HewittShawn E MondouxJoshua O CerasuoloJinhui MaNatasha ClaytonMatthew McQueenLauren E GriffithRichard PerezHsien-Yeang SeowCraig AinsworthDennis T KoAndrew WorsterPublished in: Journal of cardiovascular development and disease (2021)
Serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hsTn) testing in the emergency department (ED) and the intensive cardiac care unit may assist physicians in ruling out or ruling in acute myocardial infarction (MI). There are three major algorithms proposed for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI) using serial measurements while incorporating absolute concentration changes for MI or death following ED presentation. We sought to determine the diagnostic estimates of these three algorithms and if one was superior in two different Canadian ED patient cohorts with serial hsTnI measurements. An undifferentiated ED population (Cohort-1) and an ED population with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS; Cohort-2) were clinically managed with non-hsTn testing with the hsTnI testing performed in real-time with physicians blinded to these results (i.e., hsTnI not reported). The three algorithms evaluated were the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the High-STEACS pathway, and the COMPASS-MI algorithm. The diagnostic estimates were derived for each algorithm for the 30-day MI/death outcome for the rule-out and rule-in arm in each cohort and compared to proposed diagnostic benchmarks (i.e., sensitivity ≥ 99.0% and specificity ≥ 90.0%) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In Cohort-1 (n = 2966 patients, 15.3% had outcome) and Cohort-2 (n = 935 patients, 15.6% had outcome), the algorithm that obtained the highest sensitivity (97.8%; 95% CI: 96.0-98.9 and 98.6%; 95% CI: 95.1-99.8, respectively) in both cohorts was COMPASS-MI. Only Cohort-2 with both the ESC and COMPASS-MI algorithms exceeded the specificity benchmark (97.0%; 95% CI: 95.5-98.0 and 96.7%; 95% CI: 95.2-97.8, respectively). Patient selection for serial hsTnI testing will affect specificity estimates, with no algorithm achieving a sensitivity ≥ 99% for 30-day MI or death.
Keyphrases
- emergency department
- machine learning
- deep learning
- acute coronary syndrome
- end stage renal disease
- acute myocardial infarction
- chronic kidney disease
- primary care
- healthcare
- case report
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- public health
- randomized controlled trial
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- heart failure
- clinical trial
- palliative care
- acute kidney injury
- physical activity
- pain management
- antiplatelet therapy
- chronic pain
- health insurance