Qualitative case study of needle exchange programs in the Central Appalachian region of the United States.
Stephen M DavisDanielle DavidovAlfgeir Logi KristjanssonKeith ZulligAdam BausMelanie FisherPublished in: PloS one (2018)
Despite broad community support, program operations are threatened by growing participant volumes, funding shortages, and the federal government's prohibition on the use of funds to purchase needles. Paraphernalia laws create a legal conundrum in the form of criminal sanctions for the possession of needles, which may inadvertently promote needle sharing and disease transmission. Future studies should examine additional barriers to using clean needles provided by rural NEPs that may blunt the effectiveness of NEPs in preventing disease transmission.