Ultrasound-Guided Gastrostomy Tube Placement: An Evaluation of Postoperative Complications in the Pediatric Population.

Background: Using ultrasound guidance has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative method for gastrostomy tube placement in the pediatric population. The aim of this study is to evaluate short- and long-term postoperative complications after ultrasound-guided gastrostomy tube placement (USGTP) and to compare them with complications after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement (LGTP). Methods: A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent USGTP ( n  = 41) and LGTP ( n  = 120) at the same institution. Comparisons were made between the two groups in the context of demographics as well as 30-day and 6-month postoperative complications. A phone survey ( n  = 26) further identified USGTP complications potentially not captured in the electronic medical records. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, and indication for procedure between the two groups. Chart review revealed that USGTP and LGTP had statistically comparable rates of emergency department (ED) visits for postoperative complications. Among USGTP patients, 8% had a recorded ED visit within 30 days of the operation and 13% presented to the ED within 6 months, compared with 6% and 11%, respectively, in the LGTP group ( P  = .65, P  = .69). The USGTP phone survey reported total complications over an average postoperative follow-up time of 34.6 months (range 8-87) and revealed a total ED visit rate of 35%, which is comparable with rates reported in the literature for minimally invasive feeding tube placement. Conclusion: USGTP is a safe and feasible alternative option for gastrostomy tube placement in the pediatric population and it has postoperative complication rates that are comparable with LGTP.