Long-Term Hemorrhage and Reperfusion Rates of Coiled Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.
Lukas AndereggenSalome L BosshartSerge MarbacherBasil Erwin GrüterJatta BerberatGerrit Alexander SchubertJavier AnonMichael DiepersHans Jakob SteigerLuca RemondaPhilipp GruberPublished in: Journal of clinical medicine (2024)
Background: The endovascular approach has emerged as standard therapy for many intracranial aneurysms (IAs) to prevent hemorrhage, yet its long-term durability varies considerably. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an initially deliberate endovascular approach regarding IA hemorrhage rates over a long-term follow-up period. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included all consecutive patients with endovascularly treated IAs who presented between January 2008 and December 2020 with a follow-up of at least 12 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with long-term IA hemorrhage rates and reperfusion. The secondary endpoint was treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Independent risk factors for IA reperfusion over the long term were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Endovascular treatment was the therapy of choice for 333 patients with IAs, among whom 188 (57%) experienced rupture upon presentation. Complete coiling (Raymond I) was noted in 162 (49%) of the patients, with primary supportive devices being used in 51 (15%) patients. After a median (±SD) follow-up time of 34 ± 41 months (range 12-265 months), IA reperfusion was noted in 158 (47%), necessitating retreatment in 105 (32%) of the patients. Over the long term, hemorrhage was noted in four (1%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed aneurysmal multilobarity (HR 1.8, 95%CI 1.2-2.7; p = 0.004) and a patient age of ≥50 years (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of reperfusion over time. Intervention-related morbidity was noted in 16 (4.8%) patients, namely, thrombosis formation and contrast extravasation in 8 (2.4%) patients each, while no intervention-induced mortality was observed. Conclusion: In the long term, the hemorrhage rate in patients with IA with an initially more conservative endovascular approach is low. Therefore, a deliberate endovascular treatment approach might be justified.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- randomized controlled trial
- prognostic factors
- heart failure
- peritoneal dialysis
- endovascular treatment
- systematic review
- type diabetes
- computed tomography
- bone marrow
- cardiovascular disease
- oxidative stress
- brain injury
- case report
- pulmonary embolism
- endothelial cells
- high glucose
- single cell