Systematic review of the oncological and functional outcomes of pelvic organ-preserving radical cystectomy (RC) compared with standard RC in women who undergo curative surgery and orthotopic neobladder substitution for bladder cancer.
Erik VeskimäeYann NeuzilletMathieu RouanneSteven MaclennanThomas B L LamYuhong YuanEva CompératNigel C CowanGeorgios GakisAntoine G van der HeijdenMaria J RibalJohannes Alfred WitjesThierry LebrétPublished in: BJU international (2017)
For well-selected patients, POPRC with orthotopic neobladder may potentially be comparable to standard RC for oncological outcomes, whilst improving sexual and urinary function outcomes. However, in women undergoing RC, oncological and functional data regarding POPRC remain immature and require further evaluation in a prospective comparative setting.
Keyphrases
- rectal cancer
- systematic review
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- radical prostatectomy
- end stage renal disease
- robot assisted
- ejection fraction
- minimally invasive
- newly diagnosed
- prostate cancer
- chronic kidney disease
- pregnancy outcomes
- meta analyses
- mental health
- cervical cancer screening
- metabolic syndrome
- randomized controlled trial
- electronic health record
- big data
- type diabetes
- peritoneal dialysis
- pregnant women
- machine learning
- coronary artery disease
- glycemic control
- acute coronary syndrome