Login / Signup

Assessment of reporting quality in randomised controlled clinical trial abstracts of dental implantology published from 2014 to 2016.

Stephanie KnippschildJeremias LoddenkemperSabrina TulkaChristine LoddenkemperChristine Baulig
Published in: BMJ open (2021)
Transparent and complete reporting in abstracts appears problematic. A limited word count seems to result in a reduction in necessary information. As current scientific knowledge is often not readily available in the form of publications, abstracts constitute the primary basis for decision making in clinical practice and research. This is why journals should refrain from limiting the number of words too strictly in order to facilitate comprehensive reporting in abstracts.
Keyphrases
  • adverse drug
  • clinical trial
  • clinical practice
  • healthcare
  • study protocol
  • randomized controlled trial
  • emergency department
  • open label
  • systematic review
  • meta analyses
  • health information
  • phase ii
  • quality improvement