Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Munmun KoleyVinod Kumar VimalArvind Kumar VermaShiv Shanker PalDileep Kumar SonkarSmita VimalOm Prakash SinghShubhamoy GhoshSubhranil SahaPublished in: Journal of integrative and complementary medicine (2024)
Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) in treating hemorrhoids compared with placebo. Design: This is a double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: The trial was conducted at the surgery outpatient department of the State National Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Subjects: Patients were 140 women and men, aged between 18 and 65 years, with a diagnosis of primary hemorrhoids grades I-III for at least 3 months. Excluded were the patients with grade IV hemorrhoids, anal fissure, and fistula, hypertrophic anal papillae, inflammatory bowel disease, coagulation disorders, rectal malignancies, obstructed portal circulation, patients requiring immediate surgical intervention, and vulnerable samples. Interventions: Patients were randomized to Group 1 ( n = 70; IHMs plus concomitant care; verum) and Group 2 ( n = 70; placebos plus concomitant care; control). Outcome measures: Primary-the anorectal symptom severity and quality-of-life (ARSSQoL) questionnaire, and secondary-the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS); all of them were measured at baseline, and every month, up to 3 months. Results: Out of the 140 randomized patients, 122 were protocol compliant. Intention-to-treat sample ( n = 140) was analyzed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 two tailed. Statistically significant between-group differences were elicited in the ARSSQoL total (Mann-Whitney U [MWU]: 1227.0, p < 0.001) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MWU: 1228.0, p = 0.001) favoring homeopathy against placebos. Sulfur was the most frequently prescribed medicine. No harm or serious adverse events were reported from either of the groups. Conclusions: IHMs demonstrated superior results over placebo in the short-term treatment of hemorrhoids of grades I-III. The findings are promising, but need to be substantiated by further phase 3 trials. Clinical Trial Registration Number: CTRI/2020/03/024342.
Keyphrases
- double blind
- clinical trial
- placebo controlled
- phase iii
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- healthcare
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- open label
- randomized controlled trial
- study protocol
- prognostic factors
- type diabetes
- patient reported
- palliative care
- minimally invasive
- quality improvement
- coronary artery disease
- metabolic syndrome
- rectal cancer
- skeletal muscle
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- atrial fibrillation
- pregnancy outcomes
- affordable care act
- acute care