Coronary intervention and arteria lusoria-Not simple as it may seem.
Arsalan RafiqSurendra ChutaniNassim R KrimPublished in: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2018)
We reviewed the letter from Dr. Walter W. Woody and would like to thank him for showing his interest in our article and providing his opinion and point of view. However, we respectfully disagree with few points that have been raised. Switching to a femoral approach was considered to be a safer alternative for percutaneous intervention due to the presence of arteria lusoria. Risks and possible complications would include increased contrast use, increased radiation exposure, aortic dissection and even cerebral stroke, all of which have been reported extensively in literature. One single procedural methodology cannot be applied to a particular clinical scenario, whether simple or challenging. We have multiple different catheters and multiple different interventional approaches at our disposal to help and guide us through a case, in the best interest of the patient.
Keyphrases
- aortic dissection
- randomized controlled trial
- systematic review
- coronary artery disease
- coronary artery
- atrial fibrillation
- magnetic resonance
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- multidrug resistant
- case report
- minimally invasive
- cerebral ischemia
- risk factors
- human health
- ultrasound guided
- risk assessment
- heart failure
- editorial comment
- magnetic resonance imaging
- left ventricular
- climate change