How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting?
Edward M KerwinPaul W JonesLeif H BjermerFrançois MaltaisIsabelle H BoucotIan P NayaDavid A LipsonChris ComptonLee TombsClaus F VogelmeierPublished in: Chronic respiratory disease (2023)
This review addresses outstanding questions regarding initial pharmacological management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Optimizing initial treatment improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients, including those with low exacerbation risk. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β 2 -agonist (LAMA/LABA) dual therapy improves lung function versus LAMA or LABA monotherapy, although other treatment benefits have been less consistently observed. The benefits of dual bronchodilation in symptomatic patients with COPD at low exacerbation risk, and its duration of efficacy and cost effectiveness in this population, are not yet fully established. Questions remain on the impact of baseline symptom severity, prior treatment, degree of reversibility to bronchodilators, and smoking status on responses to dual bronchodilator treatment. Using evidence from EMAX (NCT03034915), a 6-month trial comparing the LAMA/LABA combination umeclidinium/vilanterol with umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapy in symptomatic patients with COPD at low exacerbation risk who were inhaled corticosteroid-naïve, we describe how these findings can be applied in primary care.
Keyphrases
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- lung function
- primary care
- cystic fibrosis
- clinical trial
- end stage renal disease
- chronic kidney disease
- randomized controlled trial
- mesenchymal stem cells
- phase ii
- patient reported outcomes
- cell therapy
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- muscular dystrophy
- general practice
- phase iii
- smoking cessation
- peritoneal dialysis
- duchenne muscular dystrophy
- prognostic factors