Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives.
Kathryn FackrellKatie MeadmoreAlejandra Recio-SaucedoAbby BullSimon D S FraserAmanda Blatch-JonesPublished in: BMJ open (2021)
This study provides key insights and understanding into the quality, content and value of feedback provided to NIHR applicants. The study identified key areas for improvement that can arise in NIHR funding applications, as well as in the feedback given to applicants that are applicable to other funding organisations. These findings could be used to inform funding application guidance documents to help researchers strengthen their applications and used more widely by other funders to inform their feedback processes.