The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Insurance Benefit Package Revision in Iran.
Mojtaba NouhiGrigory V ZyryanovSeyed Sajad RazaviLeon BijlmakersMoahmmad Ali SahraianZahra GoudarziParisa FarokhianJamaleddin KhedmatiReza JahangiriAlireza OlyaeemaneshPublished in: International journal of health policy and management (2022)
Implementation of the priority setting process for MS diagnosis and treatment services has likely improved the legitimacy of decision-making by involving stakeholders who engaged in deliberation based on available evidence in a stepwise, transparent process. It is expected to improve the quality of care for MS patients as well as its financial accessibility, at a zero net budget impact. The pilot project has served to help Iran's health system move faster toward UHC for a broader range of essential health services.
Keyphrases
- palliative care
- health insurance
- affordable care act
- quality improvement
- healthcare
- end stage renal disease
- mass spectrometry
- decision making
- multiple sclerosis
- primary care
- ejection fraction
- ms ms
- chronic kidney disease
- newly diagnosed
- total knee arthroplasty
- peritoneal dialysis
- randomized controlled trial
- mental health
- study protocol
- chronic pain
- total hip arthroplasty
- young adults