PD-1 blockade synergizes with oxaliplatin-based, but not cisplatin-based, chemotherapy of gastric cancer.
Peng LiuJianzhou ChenLiwei ZhaoAntoine HollebecqueOliver KeppLaurence ZitvogelGuido KroemerPublished in: Oncoimmunology (2022)
Preclinical experimentation revealed that established cancers treated with the immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducer oxaliplatin are sensitized to immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1. In contrast, no such sensitizing effect is observed when cisplatin, a non-immunogenic cell death inducer is used. Two randomized phase III clinical trials targeting unresectable gastric and gastro-esophageal junction carcinomas apparently validate this observation. Thus, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (together with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin) favorably interacted with nivolumab, yielding improved outcome. In contrast, the outcome of cisplatin-based chemotherapy (together with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) failed to be improved by concomitant treatment with pembrolizumab. These clinical findings underscore the importance of choosing appropriate ICD-inducing cytotoxicants for the development of chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens. Unfortunately, the FDA and EMA have approved PD-1 blockade in combination with "platinum-based chemotherapy" without specifying the precise nature of the platinum-containing drug. This is a non sequitur. Based on the available clinical data, such approvals should be restricted to the use of oxaliplatin.
Keyphrases
- phase iii
- locally advanced
- cell death
- clinical trial
- open label
- double blind
- rectal cancer
- phase ii study
- phase ii
- placebo controlled
- squamous cell carcinoma
- magnetic resonance
- radiation therapy
- cancer therapy
- electronic health record
- single cell
- randomized controlled trial
- chemotherapy induced
- cell proliferation
- artificial intelligence
- cell cycle arrest
- adverse drug
- drug administration
- drug induced