Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).
Philippe RigoardManuel RoulaudLisa GoudmanNihel AdjaliAmine OunajimJimmy VoirinChristophe PerruchoudBénédicte BouchePhilippe PageRémy GuillevinMathieu NaudinMartin SimoneauBertille LorgeouxSandrine BaronKevin NivoleMathilde ManyIona MaitreRaphaël RigoardRomain DavidMaarten MoensMaxime BillotPublished in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2021)
While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new waveforms, such as burst stimulation and different spatial neural targets, such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), have shown promising results. Comparisons between DRGS and standard SCS, or their combination, have never been studied on the same patients. "BOOST DRG" is the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to compare SCS vs. DRGS vs. SCS+DRGS. Sixty-six PSPS-T2 patients will be recruited internationally in three centers. Before crossing over, patients will receive each stimulation modality for 1 month, using tonic conventional stimulation. After 3 months, stimulation will consist in switching to burst for 1 month, and patients will choose which modality/waveform they receive and will then be reassessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition to our primary outcome based on pain rating, this study is designed to assess quality of life, functional disability, psychological distress, pain surface coverage, global impression of change, medication quantification, adverse events, brain functional imaging and electroencephalography, with the objective being to provide a multidimensional insight based on composite pain assessment.
Keyphrases
- neuropathic pain
- spinal cord
- end stage renal disease
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- spinal cord injury
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- multiple sclerosis
- pain management
- minimally invasive
- patient reported outcomes
- lower limb
- double blind
- high resolution
- coronary artery disease
- photodynamic therapy
- high frequency
- physical activity
- patient reported
- sleep quality
- white matter
- optical coherence tomography
- percutaneous coronary intervention