Login / Signup

How Augmenting Reality Changes the Reality of Simulation: Ethnographic Analysis.

Daniel LoebJamie ShoemakerAllison A ParsonsDaniel J SchumacherMatthew W Zackoff
Published in: JMIR medical education (2023)
The primary differences clustered around focus and attention, suspension of disbelief, and communication. Our findings provide an alternative methodology to categorize simulation, shifting focus from simulation modality and fidelity to participant behavior and experience. This alternative categorization suggests that TM simulation may be superior for practical skill acquisition and the introduction of communication strategies for novice learners. Meanwhile, AR simulation offers the opportunity for advanced training in clinical assessment. Further, AR could be a more appropriate platform for assessing communication and leadership by more experienced clinicians due to the generated environment being more representative of decompensation events. Further research will explore the attention and behavior of providers in virtual reality-based simulations and real-life resuscitations. Ultimately, these profiles will inform the development of an evidence-based guide for educators looking to optimize simulation-based medical education by pairing learning objectives with the ideal simulation modality.
Keyphrases
  • virtual reality
  • working memory
  • medical education
  • high throughput
  • palliative care