Login / Signup

A Longitudinal Case Study of Concurrent Infection with Syphilis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus During the Early Phase.

Lilin WangChaopeng ShaoLiang LuJinhong LiuZhengrong YangFang ZhaoHeng LiuXin ZhengLunan WangJinfeng Zeng
Published in: AIDS research and human retroviruses (2021)
Due to the low incidence of concurrent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis infection identified during the early phase, such as window period (WP), little is known about the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment efficacy at very early stages. One longitudinal study was conducted in a 42-year-old blood donor who was concurrently infected with syphilis and HIV. This blood donor was treated with a penicillin-based regimen and early antiretroviral therapy (ART). Sequential serological and nucleic acid tests were performed and the results were comparatively analyzed. A regular male donor who had two occasions of high-risk sexual behaviors 41 and 35 days before donation donated whole blood at the Shenzhen Blood Center. ART was initiated at the 28th day after donation (DAD), and syphilis treatment was received at the 49th DAD. Microbiological analysis using a fourth-generation anti-HIV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (4th GAHE) and electro-chemiluminesent immunoassay indicated a positive signal at the 6th DAD, while a third-generation anti-HIV ELISA (3rd GAHE) showed positive at the 26th DAD. All nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HIV RNA were reactive except the minipool NAT of 6 pooled samples at 117th DAD. The HIV viral load declined more than 4-log in copies per milliliter over 3 months, until reaching nondetectable levels at 246th DAD. Nevertheless, HIV-1 DNA was still detectable at 403rd DAD. Among all methods utilized, anti-treponema pallidum ELISA detected syphilis infection at the earliest time. A successful serological response to syphilis treatment was reached around the 80th DAD. Concurrent infection with syphilis and HIV during early phases did not significantly change the sensitivity of reagents in detection nor alter the therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of both pathogens, but might result in delayed HIV serological WP.
Keyphrases