Login / Signup

(Un)holy Smokes? Religion and Traditional and E-Cigarette Use in the United States.

Terrence D HillGeorgiana BosteanLaura UpenieksJohn P BartkowskiChristopher G EllisonAmy M Burdette
Published in: Journal of religion and health (2022)
This study employed national cross-sectional survey data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey (n = 1578 to 1735) to model traditional cigarette and e-cigarette use as a function of religious affiliation, general religiosity, biblical literalism, religious struggles, and the sense of divine control. Although the odds of abstaining from cigarettes and e-cigarettes were comparable for conservative Protestants and non-affiliates, conservative Protestants were more likely to cut down on cigarettes and e-cigarettes during the pandemic. Religiosity increased the odds of abstaining from cigarettes (not e-cigarettes) and reduced pandemic consumption of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Biblical literalism was unrelated to abstaining from cigarettes and pandemic changes in cigarette use; however, biblical literalists were more likely to cut e-cigarette use during the pandemic. While the sense of divine control was unrelated to abstaining from cigarettes and e-cigarettes, these beliefs increased the odds of cessation from traditional and e-cigarette use. Finally, our religious struggles index was unrelated to smoking behavior. Our study is among the first to report any association between religion and lower e-cigarette use.
Keyphrases
  • smoking cessation
  • replacement therapy
  • sars cov
  • coronavirus disease
  • healthcare
  • public health
  • machine learning
  • risk assessment
  • climate change
  • electronic health record
  • cross sectional