Hospital screening for obstructive sleep apnea in patients admitted to a rural, tertiary care academic hospital with heart failure.
Robert C StansburyMohamad AbdelfattahJonathan ChanAbhinav MittalFahad AlqahtaniSunil SharmaPublished in: Hospital practice (1995) (2020)
Nine hundred and fifty-eight potential subjects were identified. The three most common reasons for exclusion included previous OSA diagnosis or exposure to PAP therapy (n = 357), advanced illness (n = 380), and declined participation by the individual (n = 68). The remaining 31 subjects underwent further evaluation for obstructive sleep apnea. Twenty-three subjects had a high sleep apnea clinic score. Per our study protocol, 13 subjects who screened positive for OSA were initiated on APAP therapy. Conclusion: Our study provides important insight into the burden of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and unique challenges of hospital-based OSA screening/treatment in a rural setting. Our study identified barriers to successful screening in a rural population that may be well addressed by adapting previous research in hospital sleep medicine.
Keyphrases
- obstructive sleep apnea
- positive airway pressure
- sleep apnea
- heart failure
- south africa
- healthcare
- study protocol
- tertiary care
- physical activity
- randomized controlled trial
- clinical trial
- emergency department
- stem cells
- adverse drug
- atrial fibrillation
- mesenchymal stem cells
- bone marrow
- open label
- depressive symptoms
- combination therapy
- cell therapy
- acute heart failure
- double blind
- human health