Login / Signup

A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.

Tabea HässlerJohannes UllrichMichelle BernardinoNurit ShnabelColette Van LaarDaniel ValdenegroSimone SebbenLinda R TroppEmilio Paolo VisintinRoberto GonzálezRuth K DitlmannDominic AbramsHema Preya SelvanathanMarija BrankovićStephen WrightJorina von ZimmermannMichael H PasekAnna Lisa AydinIris Lav ŽeželjAdrienne PereiraNóra Anna LantosMario SainzAndreas GlenzHana OberpfalzerováMichal BilewiczAnna KendeOlga KuzawinskaSabine OttenEdona MalokuMasi NoorPelin GulJessica PistellaRoberto BaioccoMargareta JelicEvgeny N OsinOrly BareketDinka Corkalo BiruskiJonathan E CookManeeza DawoodLisa DroogendykAngélica Herrera LoyoKaltrina KelmendiLuiza Mugnol Ugarte
Published in: Nature human behaviour (2020)
Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size-and at times, direction-of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change-willingness to work in solidarity- that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.
Keyphrases
  • mental health
  • healthcare
  • single cell