A Scoping Review of Ayurveda Studies in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Introduction: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disorder with diverse clinical presentations. Women with PCOS use traditional, complementary, and integrative medicines, including Ayurveda (traditional Indian medicine) to manage their symptoms. Therefore, it is important to understand the current evidence base and the potential areas that require further research. Objective: This novel study aimed at providing a description of the Ayurveda studies conducted on women with PCOS and identifying gaps for future research. Methods: This scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines. Relevant electronic databases were searched for any peer-reviewed original research that examined the role of Ayurveda (interventions using single/compound formula of herbs or minerals or metals, Panchakarma procedures and other therapies, and Ayurveda-based diet and lifestyle) for managing symptoms of PCOS in women of reproductive age. Two reviewers independently screened the records, extracted the data on population, intervention, comparator, and outcome characteristics and descriptively summarized the data. Results: Of the 1820 records identified, 57 articles met the inclusion criteria; 32 case studies, 13 randomized controlled trials, 9 pre-post trials, 2 case series, and 1 non-randomized trial. Most studies were conducted in India and used either a compound formula or a complex intervention (e.g., panchakarma therapies and lifestyle modifications). The majority of the case studies/series used an Ayurvedic diagnostic approach that influenced the choice of Ayurveda intervention. Among the interventions, shatapushpa (dill seeds) and krishnatila (black sesame seeds) were the most used single herbs whereas kanchanara guggulu and rajapravartini vati were the most used compound formulas. Basti karma (therapeutic enema) was the most used complex intervention. Reproductive outcomes were the most studied; menstruation, PCOS-related infertility, and polycystic ovary morphology. Conclusions: There are a number of clinical studies on Ayurveda interventions for PCOS with a promising role in managing symptoms of PCOS. However, a few gaps were identified. Future research should aim at: (1) exploring a wider range of interventions, including Ayurvedic diet and lifestyle in different settings/locations; (2) exploring the effectiveness of Ayurveda treatments as an adjunct to biomedical treatments (3) a greater range of outcome measures such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, anxiety, depression, and quality of life needs to be further explored in women with PCOS; and (4) finally, safety and adverse event reporting needs to be undertaken rigorously and systematically.