Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting.
Pang-Shuo PerngYu ChangHao-Kuang WangYen-Ta HuangChia-En WongKuan-Yu ChiJung-Shun LeeLiang-Chao WangChih-Yuan HuangPublished in: Clinical neuroradiology (2023)
The modest quality of the data suggested comparable procedural outcomes between the transradial and transfemoral approaches when performing carotid stenting; however, high level evidence regarding postoperative brain images and risk of stroke in transradial carotid stenting are lacking. Therefore, it is reasonable for interventionists to weigh up the risks of neurological events and potential benefits, including fewer access site complications, before choosing the radial or femoral arteries as access sites. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are imperative.
Keyphrases
- antiplatelet therapy
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- randomized controlled trial
- atrial fibrillation
- cerebral ischemia
- acute coronary syndrome
- human health
- deep learning
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- ultrasound guided
- risk factors
- resting state
- white matter
- coronary artery disease
- type diabetes
- metabolic syndrome
- clinical trial
- convolutional neural network
- risk assessment
- aortic valve replacement
- quality improvement
- big data
- systematic review
- skeletal muscle
- subarachnoid hemorrhage
- climate change
- functional connectivity
- data analysis
- glycemic control