Managing Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes: What Do the Cardiovascular Outcome Trials Mean for Australian Practice?
Gary DeedJohn J AthertonMichael d'EmdenRoy RasalamAnita SharmaAndrew SindonePublished in: Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders (2019)
Understanding the implications of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes data of glucose-lowering agents on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus can be challenging for many primary practitioners. Amongst different classes of diabetes medications assessed for CV safety, several agents within the sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists classes have demonstrated CV risk reduction. Applying the trial findings to patients typically seen in clinical practice, such as those with established CV disease and those with multiple CV risk factors without established CV disease, requires further clarity. To bridge this gap in our current knowledge, the aim of this review was to utilise expert-driven opinions on common case scenarios and practical recommendations on the most appropriate choice of agents, according to an individual patient's clinical risk profile (CV and kidney disease), treatment preference and reimbursement environment from an Australian perspective.Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim Australia.
Keyphrases
- type diabetes
- clinical practice
- risk factors
- healthcare
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- glycemic control
- cardiovascular disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- climate change
- adipose tissue
- insulin resistance
- blood pressure
- binding protein
- peritoneal dialysis
- electronic health record
- prognostic factors
- patient reported outcomes
- big data
- small molecule
- combination therapy
- open label
- randomized controlled trial
- quality improvement
- blood glucose
- phase iii
- artificial intelligence
- phase ii
- replacement therapy
- smoking cessation