Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Calculated Hepatorenal Index for Diagnosing Mild and Moderate Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
Zita ZsomborAladár D RónaszékiBarbara CsongrádyRóbert StollmayerBettina Katalin BudaiAnikó FolhofferIldikó KalinaGabriella GyőriViktor BércziPál Maurovich-HorvatKrisztina HagymásiPál Novák KaposiPublished in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) (2023)
Background and Objectives : This study aims to evaluate artificial intelligence-calculated hepatorenal index (AI-HRI) as a diagnostic method for hepatic steatosis. Materials and Methods : We prospectively enrolled 102 patients with clinically suspected non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). All patients had a quantitative ultrasound (QUS), including AI-HRI, ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC,) and ultrasound backscatter-distribution coefficient (SC) measurements. The ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator (US-FLI) score was also calculated. The magnetic resonance imaging fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) was the reference to classify patients into four grades of steatosis: none < 5%, mild 5-10%, moderate 10-20%, and severe ≥ 20%. We compared AI-HRI between steatosis grades and calculated Spearman's correlation (r s ) between the methods. We determined the agreement between AI-HRI by two examiners using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 68 cases. We performed a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) for AI-HRI. Results : The mean AI-HRI was 2.27 (standard deviation, ±0.96) in the patient cohort. The AI-HRI was significantly different between groups without (1.480 ± 0.607, p < 0.003) and with mild steatosis (2.155 ± 0.776), as well as between mild and moderate steatosis (2.777 ± 0.923, p < 0.018). AI-HRI showed moderate correlation with AC (r s = 0.597), SC (r s = 0.473), US-FLI (r s = 0.5), and MRI-PDFF (r s = 0.528). The agreement in AI-HRI was good between the two examiners (ICC = 0.635, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.411-0.774, p < 0.001). The AI-HRI could detect mild steatosis (AUC = 0.758, 95% CI = 0.621-0.894) with fair and moderate/severe steatosis (AUC = 0.803, 95% CI = 0.721-0.885) with good accuracy. However, the performance of AI-HRI was not significantly different ( p < 0.578) between the two diagnostic tasks. Conclusions : AI-HRI is an easy-to-use, reproducible, and accurate QUS method for diagnosing mild and moderate hepatic steatosis.
Keyphrases
- artificial intelligence
- magnetic resonance imaging
- machine learning
- big data
- deep learning
- insulin resistance
- end stage renal disease
- high intensity
- high fat diet
- chronic kidney disease
- diffusion weighted imaging
- contrast enhanced
- high resolution
- newly diagnosed
- magnetic resonance
- adipose tissue
- high fat diet induced
- early onset
- peritoneal dialysis
- computed tomography
- skeletal muscle
- optical coherence tomography
- working memory
- fatty acid
- patient reported
- mass spectrometry
- case report