Login / Signup

Bias Correction in Estimating Proportions by Pooled Testing.

Graham HepworthBrad J Biggerstaff
Published in: Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics (2017)
In the estimation of proportions by pooled testing, the MLE is biased, and several methods of correcting the bias have been presented in previous studies. We propose a new estimator based on the bias correction method introduced by Firth (Biometrika 80:27-38, 1993), which uses a modification of the score function, and we provide an easily computable, Newton-Raphson iterative formula for its computation. Our proposed estimator is almost unbiased across a range of problems, and superior to existing methods. We show that for equal pool sizes the new estimator is equivalent to the estimator proposed by Burrows (Phytopathology 77:363-365, 1987). The performance of our estimator is examined using pooled testing problems encountered in plant disease assessment and prevalence estimation of mosquito-borne viruses.
Keyphrases
  • mental health
  • risk factors
  • phase iii
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • clinical trial
  • randomized controlled trial
  • computed tomography
  • magnetic resonance
  • case control
  • zika virus