Improving Implementation of eMental Health for Mood Disorders in Routine Practice: Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitating Factors.
Christiaan VisMayke MolAnnet KleiboerLeah BührmannTracy L FinchJohannes H SmitHeleen RiperPublished in: JMIR mental health (2018)
Of the 37 determinants, three were reported most frequently: (1) the acceptance of eMH concerning expectations and preferences of patients and professionals about receiving and providing eMH in routine care, (2) the appropriateness of eMH in addressing patients' mental health disorders, and (3) the availability, reliability, and interoperability with other existing technologies such as the electronic health records are important factors for mental health care professionals to remain engaged in providing eMH to their patients in routine care. On the basis of the taxonomy of determinants of practices developed in this review, implementation-enhancing interventions can be designed and applied to achieve better implementation outcomes. Suggestions for future research and implementation practice are provided.
Keyphrases
- healthcare
- primary care
- systematic review
- mental health
- quality improvement
- electronic health record
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- prognostic factors
- public health
- clinical practice
- risk assessment
- type diabetes
- physical activity
- randomized controlled trial
- chronic pain
- bipolar disorder
- decision making
- meta analyses
- insulin resistance
- affordable care act
- health promotion