Login / Signup

The impact of clinical decision support systems on provider behavior in the inpatient setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clare E RonanErika L CrableMari-Lynn DrainoniAllan Jay Walkey
Published in: Journal of hospital medicine (2022)
Qualitative synthesis included 22 studies. Eleven studies reported sufficient outcome data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. CDSS did not result in a statistically significant increase in clinician adoption of desired practicies (RD = 0.04 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.00, 0.07]). CDSS from 2010-2015 (n = 5) did not increase clinician adoption of desired practice [RD -0.01, (95% CI -0.04, 0.02)].CDSS from 2016-2021 (n = 6) were associated with an increase in targeted practices [RD 0.07 (95% CI0.03, 0.12)], pInteraction = 0.004. EHR [RD 0.04 (95% CI 0.00, 0.08)] vs. non-EHR [RD 0.01 (95% CI -0.01, 0.04)] based CDSS interventions did not result in different adoption of desired practices (pInteraction = 0.27). The meta-analysis did not find an overall positive impact of CDSS on clinician behavior in the inpatient setting.
Keyphrases
  • electronic health record
  • clinical decision support
  • systematic review
  • case control
  • primary care
  • healthcare
  • meta analyses
  • mental health
  • palliative care
  • randomized controlled trial
  • acute care
  • machine learning