Login / Signup

A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys.

Erica A GeldartAndrew F BarnasChristina A D SemeniukH Grant GilchristChristopher M HarrisOliver P Love
Published in: Scientific reports (2022)
Aerial drones are increasingly being used as tools for ecological research and wildlife monitoring in hard-to-access study systems, such as in studies of colonial-nesting birds. Despite their many advantages over traditional survey methods, there remains concerns about possible disturbance effects that standard drone survey protocols may have on bird colonies. There is a particular gap in the study of their influence on physiological measures of stress. We measured heart rates of incubating female common eider ducks (Somateria mollissima) to determine whether our drone-based population survey affected them. To do so, we used heart-rate recorders placed in nests to quantify their heart rate in response to a quadcopter drone flying transects 30 m above the nesting colony. Eider heart rate did not change from baseline (measured in the absence of drone survey flights) by a drone flying at a fixed altitude and varying horizontal distances from the bird. Our findings suggest that carefully planned drone-based surveys of focal species have the potential to be carried out without causing physiological impacts among colonial-nesting eiders.
Keyphrases
  • heart rate
  • heart rate variability
  • blood pressure
  • cross sectional
  • heart failure
  • atrial fibrillation
  • climate change
  • stress induced