Robot-assisted surgery in thoracic and visceral indications: an updated systematic review.
Nicole Grössmann-WaniekMichaela RiegelneggLucia GassnerClaudia WildPublished in: Surgical endoscopy (2024)
In summary, conclusive assertions on RAS superiority are impeded by inconsistent and insufficient low-quality evidence across various outcomes and procedures. While RAS may offer potential advantages in some surgical areas, healthcare decisions should also take into account the limited quality of evidence, financial implications, and environmental factors. Furthermore, considerations should extend to the ergonomic aspects for maintaining a healthy surgical environment.
Keyphrases
- robot assisted
- minimally invasive
- systematic review
- healthcare
- meta analyses
- wild type
- quality improvement
- spinal cord
- coronary artery bypass
- insulin resistance
- randomized controlled trial
- surgical site infection
- atrial fibrillation
- weight loss
- health information
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- skeletal muscle
- childhood cancer
- social media