Should I irradiate with computed tomography or sedate for magnetic resonance imaging?
Michael J CallahanJoseph P CraveroPublished in: Pediatric radiology (2021)
In the context of pediatric cross-sectional imaging, the risk of ionizing radiation for CT and the potential adverse effects associated with sedation/anesthesia for MRI continue to provoke lively discussions in the pediatric literature and lay press. This is particularly true for issues relating to the risks of ionizing radiation for CT, which has been a topic of discussion for nearly two decades. In addition to understanding these potential risks and the importance of minimizing individual pediatric patient exposure to ionizing radiation, it is equally important for radiologists to be able to frame these risks with respect to the potential for adverse outcomes associated with the use of anesthesia for cross-sectional imaging in the pediatric population. Notably, before such risks can be estimated and compared, one should always consider the potential utility of each imaging modality for a given diagnosis. If one cross-sectional imaging modality is likely to be far superior to the other for a specific clinical question, every effort must be made to safely image the child, even if sedation/anesthesia is required.
Keyphrases
- cross sectional
- human health
- computed tomography
- high resolution
- contrast enhanced
- risk assessment
- magnetic resonance imaging
- positron emission tomography
- systematic review
- image quality
- dual energy
- mental health
- fluorescence imaging
- climate change
- artificial intelligence
- magnetic resonance
- deep learning
- young adults
- mass spectrometry
- acute respiratory distress syndrome
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- diffusion weighted imaging