Login / Signup

Effects of Medical Education Program Using Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hyeon-Young KimEun-Young Kim
Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2023)
Several studies have examined the effect of virtual reality (VR) education. However, they are mostly systematic reviews or meta-analyses focusing on doctors and residents; they fail to consider VR medical education for a broader range of learners. We evaluated the effectiveness of VR education for health professionals and identified the essential features of education. Randomized controlled trials published from January 2000 to April 2020 were identified from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library (n = 299). The randomized studies' bias risk was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias tool. Meta- and subgroup-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.4.1. The overall effect was measured using Hedges' g and determined using Z-statistics ( p < 0.05). Heterogeneity was assessed using X 2 and I 2 statistics. Among the identified records, 25 studies were selected through systematic review, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. We identified a significant improvement in the VR group's skill and satisfaction levels, and that less immersive VR was more efficacious for knowledge outcomes than fully immersive VR. Maximizing the advantages of VR will increase learning opportunities and complement the limited clinical experience, thus improving medical services. A systematic and efficient VR medical education program will greatly enhance learners' core competencies.
Keyphrases
  • virtual reality
  • meta analyses
  • medical education
  • systematic review
  • healthcare
  • randomized controlled trial
  • quality improvement
  • case control
  • primary care
  • mental health
  • type diabetes
  • open label
  • single cell