Login / Signup

Cardioprotective effect of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker, in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction.

Myung Ho JeongMyung Ho JeongHo-Chun SongJahae KimAri ChongHee Seung BomIn Seok JeongSang Gi OhJong Min KimDae Sung ParkJung Ha KimKyung Seob LimMin Suk KimShi Hyun RyuHyun Kuk KimSung Soo KimSoo Young JangJae Yeong ChoHae Chang JeongKi Hong LeeKeun Ho ParkNam Sik YoonHyun Ju YoonKye Hun KimYoung-Joon HongHyung-Wook ParkJu Han KimYoungkeun AhnJeong Gwan ChoJong Chun ParkJung Chaee Kang
Published in: Journal of Korean medical science (2014)
Cardioprotective effect of fimasartan, a new angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), was evaluated in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Fifty swine were randomized to group 1 (sham, n=10), group 2 (no angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI] or ARB, n=10), group 3 (perindopril 2 mg daily, n=10), group 4 (valsartan 40 mg daily, n=10), or group 5 (fimasartan 30 mg daily, n=10). Acute MI was induced by occlusion of the left anterior descending artery for 50 min. Echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) were performed at baseline, 1 week, and 4 weeks. Iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan was done at 6 weeks for visualization of cardiac sympathetic activity. Left ventricular function and volumes at 4 weeks were similar between the 5 groups. No difference was observed in groups 2 to 5 in SPECT perfusion defect, matched and mismatched segments between SPECT and PET at 1 week and 4 weeks. MIBG scan showed similar uptake between the 5 groups. Pathologic analysis showed similar infarct size in groups 2 to 5. Infarct size reduction was not observed with use of fimasartan as well as other ACEI and ARB in a porcine model of acute MI.
Keyphrases