Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemic workup of heart failure: a meta-analysis.
Nidhish TiwariSanjana NagrajAndreas TzoumasAngelos Arfaras-MelainisAdarsh KatamreddySumit SohalLeonidas PalaiodimosPublished in: Future cardiology (2022)
Aim: The role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in evaluating the etiology of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unclear. This is a meta-analysis assessing the pooled diagnostic accuracy of CCTA in diagnosing significant coronary artery disease in HFrEF. Materials & methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies comparing CCTA with invasive coronary angiography in HFrEF. A random-effects model meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Five studies comprising 269 patients were included. On patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity and specificity of CCTA were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94-1.00) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), respectively. On segment-based analysis, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), respectively. Conclusion: CCTA has excellent diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing significant coronary artery disease in newly diagnosed HFrEF.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery disease
- newly diagnosed
- heart failure
- coronary artery
- systematic review
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- case control
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- end stage renal disease
- ejection fraction
- left ventricular
- type diabetes
- clinical trial
- case report
- magnetic resonance
- magnetic resonance imaging
- computed tomography
- randomized controlled trial
- acute heart failure
- machine learning
- prognostic factors
- cardiovascular disease
- study protocol
- ischemia reperfusion injury
- brain injury
- oxidative stress
- image quality
- patient reported outcomes
- neural network