Why we should stop performing vertebroplasties for osteoporotic spinal fractures.
Rachelle BuchbinderLucy BusijaPublished in: Internal medicine journal (2020)
While vertebroplasty enjoys continued use in some settings, there is now high-moderate quality evidence based on systematic review that includes five placebo-controlled trials that it provides no benefits over placebo and these results do not differ according to pain duration (≤6 vs >6 weeks). A clinically important increased risk of incident symptomatic vertebral fractures or other serious adverse events cannot be excluded due to small event numbers. Serious harms including cord compression, ventricular perforation, pulmonary embolism, infection and death have been reported. This unfavourable risk-benefit ratio should be convincing doctors and patients to stop the use of vertebroplasty. At the very least, clinicians should fully inform their patients about the evidence including the likelihood of improving without vertebroplasty and the potential harms, so that patients can make evidence-informed decisions about their treatment. They should also warn patients about the pitfalls of relying on information sourced from the internet or from 'awareness raising' campaigns.
Keyphrases
- end stage renal disease
- systematic review
- pulmonary embolism
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- chronic kidney disease
- prognostic factors
- peritoneal dialysis
- squamous cell carcinoma
- spinal cord injury
- healthcare
- type diabetes
- patient reported outcomes
- spinal cord
- randomized controlled trial
- risk assessment
- climate change
- placebo controlled
- postmenopausal women
- quality improvement
- medical students