Final 5-Year Report of the Randomized BIO-RESORT Trial Comparing 3 Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in All-Comers.
Eline H PloumenTineke H PinxterhuisRosaly A BuitenPaolo ZoccaPeter W DanseCarl E SchotborghMartijn ScholteR Melvyn Tjon Joe GinSamer SomiK Gert van HouwelingenMartin G StoelH A F de ManMarc HartmannGerard C M LinssenLiefke C van der HeijdenMarlies M KokCarine J M DoggenClemens von BirgelenPublished in: Journal of the American Heart Association (2022)
Background In a previous trial, higher 5-year mortality was observed following treatment with biodegradable polymer Orsiro sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). We assessed 5-year safety and efficacy of all-comers as well as patients with diabetes treated with SES or Synergy everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus durable polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES). Methods and Results The randomized BIO-RESORT (Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer and Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in an All Comers Population) trial enrolled 3514 all-comer patients at 4 Dutch cardiac centers. Patients aged ≥18 years who required percutaneous coronary intervention were eligible. Participants were stratified for diabetes and randomized to treatment with SES, EES, or ZES (1:1:1). The main end point was target vessel failure (cardiac mortality, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Five-year follow-up was available in 3183 of 3514 (90.6%) patients. The main end point target vessel failure occurred in 142 of 1169 (12.7%) patients treated with SES, 130 of 1172 (11.6%) treated with EES, versus 157 of 1173 (14.1%) treated with ZES (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71-1.12], P log-rank =0.31; and HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65-1.04], P log-rank =0.10, respectively). Individual components of target vessel failure showed no significant between-stent difference. Very late definite stent thrombosis rates were low and similar (SES, 1.1%; EES, 0.6%; ZES, 0.9%). In patients with diabetes, target vessel failure did not differ significantly between stent-groups (SES, 19.8%; EES, 19.2%; versus ZES, 21.1% [ P log-rank =0.69 and P log-rank =0.63]). Conclusions Orsiro SES, Synergy EES, and Resolute Integrity ZES showed similar 5-year outcomes of safety and efficacy, including mortality. A prespecified stent comparison in patients with diabetes also revealed no significant differences in 5-year clinical outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01674803.
Keyphrases
- phase iii
- phase ii
- newly diagnosed
- open label
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- end stage renal disease
- double blind
- clinical trial
- ejection fraction
- placebo controlled
- study protocol
- drug delivery
- cardiovascular events
- chronic kidney disease
- left ventricular
- prognostic factors
- heart failure
- type diabetes
- acute myocardial infarction
- randomized controlled trial
- emergency department
- cardiovascular disease
- patient reported outcomes
- pulmonary embolism
- adipose tissue
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- weight loss