Login / Signup

Do reporting guidelines have an impact? Empirical assessment of changes in reporting before and after the PRISMA extension statement for network meta-analysis.

Areti Angeliki VeronikiSofia TsokaniStella ZevgitiIrene PagkalidouKaterina-Maria KontouliPinar AmbarciogluNikos PandisCarole LunnyAdriani NikolakopoulouTheodoros PapakonstantinouAnna ChaimaniSharon E StrausBrian HuttonAndrea C TriccoDimitris MavridisGeorgia Salanti
Published in: Systematic reviews (2021)
NMAs published after 2015 more frequently reported the five items associated with NMA compared to those published until 2015. However, improvement in reporting after 2015 is compatible with that observed on a yearly basis until 2015, and hence, it could not be attributed solely to the publication of the PRISMA-NMA.
Keyphrases
  • meta analyses
  • systematic review
  • adverse drug
  • randomized controlled trial
  • clinical practice
  • emergency department