How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?
Steeve RouillonHouria El OuazzaniJean-Benoit HardouinLine EnjalbertSylvie RabouanVirginie MigeotMarion Albouy-LlatyPublished in: International journal of environmental research and public health (2020)
Background: Despite mediatization, only half of pregnant women are informed about endocrine disruptors (EDs). We wished to inquire about appropriate environmental health education procedures during pregnancy: Who, when, and how? Methods: The question stems from a comprehensive population health intervention research project. It includes qualitative studies aimed at constructing an educational program in environmental health and an accompanying assessment tool. The validation of a customized questionnaire (PREVED© for Pregnancy Prevention Endocrine Disruptors) about the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of pregnant women regarding exposure to EDs was carried out in a quantitative study. Results: Health education by a prenatal professional with communication skills should take place as early as possible, during the preconception period or early pregnancy, as part of individual consultation or group workshops. In order to customize the discourse and to develop women's empowerment, concomitant presentation of the risks by the products used in each room and of previous solutions is recommended. Conclusion: Appropriate health education procedures on EDs should be done at every contact but taking the KAP of pregnant women into account first. We propose all educational actions should be accompanied by questioning of the KAP of pregnant women; for example, with questions from the PREVED© questionnaire.
Keyphrases
- pregnant women
- healthcare
- pregnancy outcomes
- public health
- quality improvement
- human health
- mental health
- health information
- randomized controlled trial
- risk assessment
- type diabetes
- polycystic ovary syndrome
- psychometric properties
- adipose tissue
- skeletal muscle
- preterm birth
- insulin resistance
- patient reported
- clinical evaluation