Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vikash JaiswalSong Peng AngAbhigan Babu ShresthaAmey JoshiAngela IshakJia Ee ChiaSanchita Suresh KanakannavrSidra NazNeel DoshiDhairya NanavatyAsmita GeraVikash KumarFarshid DaneshvarDavid SongKripa RajakPublished in: Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) (2023)
The results of this meta-analysis suggest that CABG is superior to PCI for patients with LVSD. CABG was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, repeat revascularization, and incidence of myocardial infarction compared with PCI in patients with LVSD.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- left ventricular
- acute myocardial infarction
- st segment elevation myocardial infarction
- systematic review
- coronary artery disease
- st elevation myocardial infarction
- antiplatelet therapy
- acute coronary syndrome
- heart failure
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- cardiac resynchronization therapy
- mitral valve
- aortic stenosis
- meta analyses
- left atrial
- coronary artery bypass
- risk factors
- atrial fibrillation
- oxidative stress
- blood pressure
- case control
- ejection fraction
- randomized controlled trial
- catheter ablation