A Theory-Informed Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers to Implementing Multi-Drug Pharmacogenomic Testing.
Essra YoussefDebi BhattacharyaRavi SharmaDavid J WrightPublished in: Journal of personalized medicine (2022)
PGx testing requires a complex set of activities undertaken by practitioners and patients, resulting in varying implementation success. This systematic review aimed (PROSPERO: CRD42019150940) to identify barriers and enablers to practitioners and patients implementing pharmacogenomic testing. We followed PRISMA guidelines to conduct and report this review. Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubMed Central were systematically searched from inception to June 2022. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) guided the organisation and reporting of barriers or enablers relating to pharmacogenomic testing activities. From the twenty-five eligible reports, eleven activities were described relating to four implementation stages: ordering, facilitating, interpreting, and applying pharmacogenomic testing. Four themes were identified across the implementation stages: IT infrastructure, effort, rewards, and unknown territory. Barriers were most consistently mapped to TDF domains: memory, attention and decision-making processes, environmental context and resources, and belief about consequences.
Keyphrases
- systematic review
- primary care
- end stage renal disease
- healthcare
- chronic kidney disease
- quality improvement
- newly diagnosed
- ejection fraction
- meta analyses
- decision making
- working memory
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- adverse drug
- patient reported outcomes
- clinical practice
- general practice