Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data.
Panagiotis T TasoudisDimitrios N VarvoglisEvangelos VitkosKonstantinos S MylonasMichel Pompeu SáJohn S IkonomidisThomas G CaranasosThanos AthanasiouPublished in: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (2022)
Survival rates seem to not be influenced by the type of prosthesis in patients <50 years old. The survival advantage in favour of mechanical valves is observed in patients 50-70 years old, while in patients >70 years old bioprosthetic valves offer better survival outcomes.
Keyphrases
- aortic valve replacement
- end stage renal disease
- aortic valve
- ejection fraction
- systematic review
- aortic stenosis
- newly diagnosed
- chronic kidney disease
- peritoneal dialysis
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- transcatheter aortic valve implantation
- transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- coronary artery disease
- patient reported outcomes
- artificial intelligence
- patient reported
- electronic health record