Diagnostic Efficacy of Carotid Ultrasound for Predicting the Risk of Perioperative Hypotension or Fluid Responsiveness: A Meta-Analysis.
Kuo-Chuan HungYen-Ta HuangWen-Wen TsaiPing-Heng TanJheng-Yen WuPo-Yu HuangTing-Hui LiuI-Wen ChenCheuk-Kwan SunPublished in: Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (2023)
Despite the acceptance of carotid ultrasound for predicting patients' fluid responsiveness in critical care and anesthesia, its efficacy for predicting hypotension and fluid responsiveness remains unclear in the perioperative setting. Electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2023 to identify observational studies focusing on the use of corrected blood flow time (FTc) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak) for assessing the risks of hypotension and fluid responsiveness. Using FTc as a predictive tool (four studies), the analysis yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72 to 0.89) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.97) for the risk of hypotension (area under curve (AUC): 0.95). For fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity and specificity of FTc were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.84) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.86), respectively (AUC: 0.87). In contrast, the use of ΔVpeak to predict the risk of fluid responsiveness showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.85) and specificity of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.8) (AUC: 0.79). The current meta-analysis provides robust evidence supporting the high diagnostic accuracy of FTc in predicting perioperative hypotension and fluid responsiveness, which requires further studies for verification.
Keyphrases
- blood flow
- systematic review
- cardiac surgery
- magnetic resonance imaging
- patients undergoing
- end stage renal disease
- magnetic resonance
- clinical trial
- case control
- chronic kidney disease
- ejection fraction
- newly diagnosed
- randomized controlled trial
- computed tomography
- machine learning
- open label
- artificial intelligence
- phase iii
- structural basis