A randomized wait-list controlled trial of Men in Mind: Enhancing mental health practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to work with men.
Zac E SeidlerMichael J WilsonRuben BenakovicAndrew J MackinnonSimrin SanghaJohn S OgrodniczukSimon M RiceJesse OwenAndrea PhelpsCathrine MihalopolousLong Khanh-Dao LeMichael J WilsonPublished in: The American psychologist (2023)
Improved engagement of men in psychotherapy is an essential element in improving male health outcomes. This trial examined whether the Men in Mind intervention improved practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to engage and respond to male clients in therapy. A parallel, single-blind, wait-list randomized controlled trial was conducted with Australian-based mental health practitioners, currently administering psychotherapy to males, fluent in English, and not currently completing their undergraduate degree. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1, through variable-sized blocks stratified by gender, to either the intervention (Men in Mind) or wait-list control. Men in Mind was offered as a self-led 6-week, five-module online program to upskill practitioners to engage and respond to male clients. The primary outcome was self-reported competency in engaging men in psychotherapy, measured by the Engaging Men in Therapy Scale (EMITS) at 6 weeks. All analyses were by intention-to-treat. Between January 16 and March 17, 2022, 587 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention ( n = 300) or wait-list control ( n = 287). In total, 492 (84%) participants completed the primary endpoint assessment at 6 weeks. Men in Mind demonstrated a large effect of improved EMITS scores compared to the control group ( d = 2.63, 95% CI [2.39, 2.87], p < .001). Men in Mind was effective at increasing mental health practitioners' self-reported efficacy to work with men, which is potentially a key change mechanism in their ability to improve health outcomes for male clients. A limitation of the trial was the use of a bespoke, self-reported primary outcome, while a strength was the gender-responsive intervention design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Keyphrases
- randomized controlled trial
- mental health
- middle aged
- primary care
- study protocol
- clinical trial
- healthcare
- systematic review
- emergency department
- stem cells
- social media
- public health
- hepatitis c virus
- bone marrow
- mental illness
- mesenchymal stem cells
- preterm birth
- posttraumatic stress disorder
- phase ii
- men who have sex with men
- medical students
- antiretroviral therapy