The results of the landmark ISCHEMIA trial solidified the importance of guideline-directed medical therapy and have provided more evidence against the prevailing dogma that moderate to severe ischemia on traditional stress testing mandates coronary revascularization. This trial was not designed to compare different cardiac imaging and stress testing modalities for the assessment of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing their index evaluation for SIHD; however, its design, which included coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in most patients, and results have generated robust discussion regarding ways to improve non-invasive testing strategies in similar patient populations. We believe that increased utilization of CCTA to identify patients with and without high-risk SIHD, and advanced tests for ischemia, such as positron emission tomography and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, when selected based on individual patient characteristics, may allow for improved decision-making and outcomes.
Keyphrases
- coronary artery disease
- positron emission tomography
- computed tomography
- study protocol
- magnetic resonance imaging
- phase iii
- left ventricular
- phase ii
- patients undergoing
- high resolution
- coronary artery
- percutaneous coronary intervention
- clinical trial
- end stage renal disease
- coronary artery bypass grafting
- ejection fraction
- decision making
- case report
- aortic stenosis
- newly diagnosed
- healthcare
- cardiovascular events
- prognostic factors
- randomized controlled trial
- optical coherence tomography
- stress induced
- chronic kidney disease
- open label
- heart failure
- peritoneal dialysis
- type diabetes
- heat stress
- high intensity
- cardiovascular disease
- acute coronary syndrome
- skeletal muscle
- bone marrow
- weight loss
- magnetic resonance