Mixed method evaluation of the CEBHA+ integrated knowledge translation approach: a protocol.
Lisa Maria PfadenhauerTanja GrathPeter DelobelleNasreen JessaniJoerg J MeerpohlAnke RohwerBey-Marrié SchmidtIngrid ToewsAnn R AkitengGertrude ChapoteraTamara KredoNaomi LevittSeleman NtawuyirushintegeKerstin SellEva A RehfuessPublished in: Health research policy and systems (2021)
Evaluating a complex intervention such as the CEBHA+ IKT approach is complicated, even more so when undertaken across five diverse countries. Despite conceptual, methodological and practical challenges, our comparative case study addresses important evidence gaps: While involving decision-makers in the research process is gaining traction worldwide, we still know very little regarding (i) whether this approach really makes a difference to evidence uptake, (ii) the mechanisms that make IKT successful, and (iii) relevant differences across socio-cultural contexts. The evaluation described here is intended to provide relevant insights on all of these aspects, notably in countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and is expected to contribute to the science of IKT overall.