Evaluating research co-production: protocol for the Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ+ 4 Co-Pro) framework.
Robert K D McLeanFred CardenIan D GrahamAlice B AikenRebecca ArmstrongJudy BrayChristine E CassidyOlivia DaubErica Di RuggieroLeslie A FierroMichelle GagnonAlison M HutchinsonRoman KislovAnita KothariSara KreindlerChris McCutcheonJessica ReszelGayle ScarrowPublished in: Implementation science communications (2022)
This study will yield knowledge about a new way to assess research co-production. Specifically, it will address the relevance and utility of using RQ+ 4 Co-Pro, a framework that includes context as an inseparable component of research, identifies dimensions of quality matched to the aims of co-production, and applies a systematic and transferable evaluative method for reaching conclusions. This is a needed area of innovation for research co-production to reach its full potential. The findings may benefit co-producers interested in understanding the quality of their work, but also other stewards of research co-production. Accordingly, we undertake this study as a co-production team representing multiple perspectives from across the research enterprise, such as funders, journal editors, university administrators, and government and health organization leaders.